Bence, on Jun 9 2008, 02:13 AM, said:
Interesting. On my car UPGP has less slickness than OCW II, and UPGP looks good only from flatter angles. As the angles grow, the look flattens, and become uninspiring. I think we have to test them side by side on different paints. IME OOS (vs. UPGP) has a significant advantage in water management.
I'd add the next layers after 20-30 minutes.
I am sure different paints respond differently to different products - in looks as well as durability etc, but dont have evidence to support that...
i agree with the water management aspect - I think OOS beads and sheets off water much better than UPGP, in fact I had issues initially struggling to get UPGP to release water. I washed the car, rinsed it, sheeted it and it still had beads all over it. Went for a 80mph drive and came back and STILL water on it

I put OOS on my MG earlier in the spring - just a quick top up layer, and went out for the day. It poured down half way through the journey and the car was soaked, but the roll-off of the water was amazing, and once the rain stopped and we kept driving, the car completely self dried
It hasnt rained since I did the OCW so havent experienced beading/sheeting effects yet, but my hope is that it improves the performance of UPGP as well. I'd like to keep the car topped up with OCW and next I am very tempted to try DWG/OOS/OCW and see how that goes?
I do really like OOS, and I am struggling to go back to any kind of LSP that isnt a WOWA product. Have you used Z-CS yet? I hear durability is amazing, but mixed reports on the look....